Saturday, May 31, 2014

Breast Surgery,General Perspective and Overview

General Perspective and Overview
The relative risks and complications increase proportionately according to the
type of surgery, site of a breast lesion, extent of procedure performed, technique,
the complexity of the problem, and the breast and lesion size. Extensive
or complex surgery usually carries higher risks of bleeding and infection than
smaller procedures, in general terms. Similarly, risk is relatively higher for
recurrent and complex breast problems, for associated axillary lymph node
dissections and especially for those closer to neural structures (e.g., brachial
plexus, axillary, long thoracic, or thoracodorsal). Axillary lymph node dissection
procedures are typically associated with a higher frequency and greater
range of complications compared to procedures involving the breast alone.
This is principally related to the surgical accessibility, risk of tissue/nerve
injury, seroma formation, and interruption of lymphatic channels and outflow
from the upper limb and chest.


Reconstructive procedures carry a further range of potential complications also
related to the donor site for autogenous tissue (e.g., back or abdomen) or the use of
foreign material as an implant (e.g., breast prosthesis or abdominal mesh). This, in
broad terms, increases the extent of tissue injury and risk of infection, bleeding, and
nerve injury. The type and extent of any reconstructive procedure is associated with
complications related to “technical and anatomic” issues.
In general, for many breast operations, the complications are similar in type
and frequency. Knowledge of the anatomy and the variations commonly seen
are helpful in minimizing nerve and vessel injury. Surgeons argue the benefi ts
of one approach over the other, but there is somewhat little tangible data to
demonstrate differences in terms of the observed or reported complications.
Other surgeons will argue that the use of drains adds to the complication rates,
but this needs to be balanced with the extent and risks of bleeding and lymphatic
leakage.
Possible reduction in the risk of misunderstandings over complications or consequences
from breast surgery might be achieved by:
• Good explanation of the risks, aims, benefi ts, and limitations of the procedure(s)
• Useful planning considering the anatomy, approach, alternatives, and method
• Avoiding likely associated vessels and nerves
• Adequate clinical follow-up
Multisystem failure, systemic sepsis, and death are rare after breast surgery,
even with extensive reconstruction, but are reported and remain a risk.
Positioning on the operating table has been associated with increased
risk of deep venous thrombosis and nerve palsies , especially in prolonged
procedures.
The use of specialized units with standardized preoperative assessment,
multidisciplinary input, and high-quality postoperative care is essential to
the success of complex breast surgery overall and can signifi cantly reduce risk of
complications or aid early detection, prompt intervention, and cost.
2 Breast Surgery
With these factors and facts in mind, the information given in this chapter must
be appropriately and discernibly interpreted and used.

Important Note
It should be emphasized that the risks and frequencies that are given here
represent derived fi gures . These fi gures are best estimates of relative frequencies
across most institutions , not merely the highest-performing ones, and as
such are often representative of a number of studies, which include different
patients with differing comorbidities and different surgeons. In addition,
the risks of complications in lower- or higher-risk patients may lie outside
these estimated ranges, and individual clinical judgment is required as to the
expected risks communicated to the patient, staff, or for other purposes. The
range of risks is also derived from experience and the literature; while risks
outside this range may exist, certain risks may be reduced or absent due to
variations of procedures or surgical approaches. It is recognized that different
patients, practitioners, institutions, regions, and countries may vary in their

requirements and recommendations.

No comments:

Post a Comment